The Economic North–South Divide

The Economic North–South Divide

Six Decades of Unequal Development

Kunibert Raffer and H. W. Singer

The Economic North–South Divide explores the structural roots of the debt crisis and considers the impact of debt management on North–South economic relations, exposing certain double standards that tilt global markets further against the South. Encouraged by recent successful opposition to neoliberalism, the authors finally propose ideas for a world where people seem to matter.

Chapter 4: The Neoliberal Tide of the ‘Washington Consensus’

Kunibert Raffer and H. W. Singer

Subjects: development studies, development economics, economics and finance, development economics


The 1980s were not only a period of diminishing returns in development thinking, as identified by Ranis and Fei (1988, p.10), but also the decade of the victory of neoliberalism, a pronounced backswing of the pendulum towards anti-Keynesianism, anti-interventionism and monoeconomics. Lack of theoretical impetus was compensated by more enthusiastic belief in the benevolence of ‘free’ markets, deregulation and privatization. This conservative tide virtually wiped out critical thinking in the social sciences, completely muting critical approaches in development studies. The breakdown of the Soviet bloc, allegedly the final victory of capitalism, contributed to a practically unchallenged rule of neoliberal ideology, first shaken in 1997 by the Asian crisis. Rodrik (1996, p.9) calls the extent of convergence about current fashions in economic development policy remarkable. What unites the ‘vast majority of professional economists in the developed world who are concerned with issues of development’ now is ‘faith in the desirability and efficacy’ of a strategy which ‘emphasizes fiscal rectitude, competitive exchange rates, free trade, privatization, undistorted market prices, and limited intervention’ (ibid.). The prevailing attitude towards price distortions illustrates this fundamental change in a nutshell. Streeten (1994) draws attention to the curious transformation of the expression ‘getting prices right’. In the 1960s, it meant the calculation of correct shadow or accounting prices instead of market or actual prices reflecting all sorts of distortions. Market power, externalities or highly imperfect markets in many SCs are reasons why actual prices are unlikely to reflect correct prices in the textbook sense. In an economy...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information