Table of Contents

National Competitiveness and Economic Growth

National Competitiveness and Economic Growth

The Changing Determinants of Economic Performance in the World Economy

New Horizons in Institutional and Evolutionary Economics series

Timo J. Hämäläinen

The current paradigm shift in the world economy is challenging the traditional competitiveness and growth theories with their few explanatory variables. This book offers a more holistic framework to synthesise the key findings of the various branches of competitiveness and growth research. The author illustrates this framework with a new long wave theory of socio-economic development. This theory emphasises the competitiveness and growth benefits of rapid structural adjustment in the rapidly changing techno-economic environment. Based on thorough analysis the author argues that both markets and governments have become less efficient due to the current transformation of the world economy. His empirical data from 22 OECD countries in the 1980s and 1990s illustrates that efficiency and growth-oriented governments have significantly contributed to their countries’ economic success.

Chapter 12: Institutional framework

Timo J. Hämäläinen

Subjects: economics and finance, institutional economics, international economics


The world of neoclassical economics is characterized by atomistic competition, perfect information and no economic uncertainty. This abstract world neglects institutions that facilitate efficient transactions and production in real economic systems. Institutions play this important role by reducing the bounded rationality, opportunism and uncertainty which characterize complex economic systems (Commons 1970; North 1990; Hechter 1990; Whitley 1992a, 1992b). This chapter analyzes the nature and evolution of institutions as well as their influence on economic competitiveness and growth. 1 NATURE AND EVOLUTION OF INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK The word ‘institution’ has different meanings for different persons. In his Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Oliver Williamson defined institutions as alternative organizational mechanisms: markets, hybrids and hierarchies (Williamson 1985). John R. Common viewed institutions as established societal organizations, or ‘going concerns’, which included inter alia universities, labor unions, churches, political parties and the government (Commons 1970, p. 129). Hechter, in turn, used a more indirect definition by arguing that ‘the existence of social institutions . . . [is] . . . revealed by the appearance of some regularity in collective behavior’ (Hechter 1990). In this study we adopt Douglass North’s (1990) definition which includes three major elements that shape the political, economic and social interaction of economic agents: informal behavioral constraints and incentives (values, customs, traditions etc.), formal rules (constitutions, laws, regulations and contracts) and their enforcement (North 1990).1 Culturally embedded values, norms, traditions, conventions, customs, sanctions, taboos and codes of conduct form the informal institutional constraints and incentives that shape human and organizational behavior. Informal institutions provide human actors with...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information