European Monetary Integration

European Monetary Integration

Past, Present and Future

Edited by Eric J. Pentecost and André Van Poeck

This highly topical book examines the development and future prospects for economic and monetary union in Europe. European Monetary Integration examines the background to economic and monetary union from a historical perspective that distinguishes between national and supranational currency areas, and an optimal currency area theory. The gradualist transition process is also considered.

Chapter 8: ERM-II: Problems for the ‘Outs’ and their Relationship with the ‘Ins’

Heather D. Gibson and Euclid Tsakalotos

Subjects: economics and finance, financial economics and regulation, money and banking


Heather D. Gibson and Euclid Tsakalotos 1 INTRODUCTION March 1998 saw the publication by the European Commission and the European Monetary Institute (EMI) of two independent reports on convergence of European Union (EU) countries (in relation to the provisions laid down in the Maastricht Treaty). On the basis of these reports on the extent to which individual EU countries met with the convergence criteria, ECOFIN (the Council of EU Finance Ministers) decided in May 1998 which countries were eligible to join the European Monetary Union (EMU). At the same time, the exchange rates for EMU entry were also announced. As a consequence of this decision, the situation in the EU has been very different since 1 January 1999. Most member states participate in the eurozone and the common monetary and exchange rate policy (the ‘ins’) but there are those which do not (the ‘outs’). The purpose of this chapter is to examine the relationship between the ‘ins’ and the ‘outs’ and, on the basis of past EU experience, suggest the kinds of problems which the ‘outs’ in particular might be expected to face. Our account here will, by necessity, touch upon many well-known debates and controversies concerning how best to arrive at monetary union. For instance, take the issues at stake between the so-called ‘economists’ and ‘monetarists’. The former have usually argued that monetary integration should be preceded by economic and economic policy integration, with financial integration – the removal of all capital controls and completely fixed exchange rates – as the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information