The Revival of Laissez-Faire in American Macroeconomic Theory

The Revival of Laissez-Faire in American Macroeconomic Theory

A Case Study of the Pioneers

Sherryl Davis Kasper

This book provides the definitive account of this watershed and traces the evolution of laissez-faire using the cases of its proponents, Frank Knight, Henry Simons, Friedrich von Hayek, Milton Friedman, James Buchanan and Robert Lucas. By elucidating the pre-analytical framework of their writings, Sherryl Kasper accounts for the ideological influence of these pioneers on theoretical work, and illustrates that they played a primary role in founding the theoretical and philosophical use of rules as the basis of macroeconomic policy. A case study of the way in which interwar pluralism transcended to postwar neoclassicism is also featured.

Chapter 7: Robert E. Lucas, Jr. and New Classical Economics

Sherryl Davis Kasper

Subjects: economics and finance, austrian economics, economic psychology, history of economic thought


7. Robert E. Lucas, Jr and new classical economics The professional reception to the research of Robert E. Lucas, Jr (b. 1937) brings full circle the evolution in the attitude toward laissezfaire in twentieth-century macroeconomics. In the early 1970s he began work on the new classical models ostensibly as an extension of the natural rate hypothesis developed by Friedman and Phelps; by the end of the decade these models emerged into the standard framework for analysis in macroeconomic theory. As a result, in much the same fashion that Friedman developed the monetarist counter-example in the framework of Keynesian economics, Keynesian economists began to formulate their research in new classical structures.1 Further, the new classical models demonstrated more rigorously than those developed by Friedman and Buchanan that the economy is managed more efficiently with a laissez-faire framework of policy rules. For these models portray discretionary policy as ineffective in offsetting business cycles in both the long run and the short run and as a cause of instability in the economy. In effect, Lucas had inspired a counter-revolution against Keynesian economics and its interventionist policy prescriptions. In 1995, the Nobel Committee awarded Lucas, the leader of this revolution, its prize in economics ‘for having developed and applied the hypothesis of rational expectations, and thereby having transformed macroeconomic analysis and deepening our understanding of economic policy’. This change in prominence from Keynesian to new classical models took place in a professional environment influenced by both external events and internal debates. In 1965 an...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information