Industrial Location Economics

Industrial Location Economics

Edited by Philip McCann

Because space is not homogenous, economic activities occur in different locations. Understanding the reasons behind this and understanding exactly how industries are spatially organized is the central theme of this book. Industrial Location Economics discusses different aspects of industrial location behaviour from a variety of theoretical and empirical perspectives. Each of the analytical traditions provides insights into the nature of industrial location behaviour and the factors which can influence it.

Chapter 6: Global Cities, Internationalization and Urban Systems

Ian R. Gordon

Subjects: economics and finance, industrial economics, regional economics, geography, economic geography, urban and regional studies, regional economics


Ian R. Gordon London School of Economics, UK 1. INTRODUCTION The idea of ‘global cities’ as an increasingly important real-world phenomenon, achieving wide currency over the past 20 years, represents a combination of two broader notions: the first involving a progressive internationalization (or, in stronger versions, globalization) of relationships; and the second a revaluation of the advantages of urban agglomeration (and perhaps specifically of core cities). These all clearly relate to some realities of this period. But Markusen (1999) is right to point out that, as with a number of other popular contemporary ideas such as that of ‘clusters’ (cf. Gordon and McCann, 2000), there is an undesirable fuzziness about the way in which the global (or world) city concept has been employed.1 And, as with many other of these cases, the fuzziness of the global cities idea seems to be not merely unfortunate – given its potential applicability in urban policy making – but actually rather central to the way in which the idea gets applied by those with stakes in this policy arena. Characteristically with such fuzzy concepts, quite strong evidence can be found in support of some of the propositions that they embody, while for others it is substantially lacking – but, without clear distinctions (and an interest in empirical testing), irrelevant evidence lends support to more problematic ideas, even when it is the latter which are crucial to the policy agenda. One very broad example of this slippage can be found in the language used to refer to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information