Table of Contents

Is There Progress in Economics?

Is There Progress in Economics?

Knowledge, Truth and the History of Economic Thought

Edited by Stephan Boehm, Christian Gehrke, Heinz D. Kurz and Richard Sturn

This thought-provoking book discusses the concept of progress in economics and investigates whether any advance has been made in its different spheres of research. The authors look back at the history, successes and failures of their respective fields and thoroughly examine the notion of progress from an epistemological and methodological perspective.

Chapter 1: Does Progress matter?

Donald Winch

Subjects: economics and finance, economic psychology, history of economic thought, methodology of economics


Donald Winch My question gestures towards the organizing theme of this conference, but a more appropriate one, as I hope to show, would be VoltaireÕs conclusion in Candide. I shall mention progress now and then, but I feel more comfortable with something less grandiose, a miniature painting rather than the kind of broad philosophical landscape that anything connected with progress in the eighteenth- or nineteenth-century sense, or modernization in mid-twentieth century mode, suggests or requires. My miniature begins with the following quotation from John Stuart MillÕs correspondence. ÔA History of Political Economy is not a kind of book much wanted on its own account, but it would afford an opportunity for interesting discussions of all the contested points, and for placing them in the strong light which results from the comparison of conflicting opinions and from a study of their origins and filiation. Though, therefore, it is a work I should hardly suggest to anyone, yet if any competent political economist with a talent for philosophical controversy feels spontaneously prompted to undertake it, the result is likely to be useful and interesting to those who care for the subject.Õ (Mill, 1972, XV: 907) Judging from this response to an inquiry from his disciple, Henry Fawcett, who had just had the good fortune to be elected to the Chair of Political Economy at Cambridge at the tender age of thirty, it does not sound as though Mill was enthusiastic about our branch of historical scholarship. Fawcett would have been...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information