Chapter 5: A Review of Privatization and Regulation Experience in the UK – Irwin M. Stelzer, Chairman’s Comments – Stephen Littlechild
I should like to begin this chapter by declaring an interest, a practice that I understand is at times followed by some members of your Parliament. In addition to my work at the Hudson Institute, and at The Sunday Times, I serve as a consultant to News International, BSkyB, and several energy companies that have a presence in the UK. That the topics of privatization and regulation should be linked is proof that monopoly power cannot be entrusted to private, profitmaximizing corporations.1 (It must be placed under the control of the state, either through direct ownership, or by regulating its exercise. In this chapter I shall argue that regulation is a more efficient means of controlling monopoly power than is state ownership, that introducing competition is superior to both, but that merely chanting, in the manner of the Chicago school, that all monopoly power is transitory, is to elevate hope over experience, or at a minimum to give a very generous definition to the number of years that can be included in the word ‘transitory’.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.