Incentives to Improve Education

Incentives to Improve Education

A New Perspective

Robert McMeekin

Incentives to Improve Education identifies three categories of incentives: rewards, (financial rewards for teachers), competition (educational choice, often in the form of payment for education by voucher) and threats (introduction of external standards and accountability for performance).

Appendix A: Contracting in Schools

Robert McMeekin

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of education, institutional economics, labour economics, post-keynesian economics, education, economics of education, politics and public policy, public policy, social policy and sociology, labour policy


WHY DO CONTRACTS IN SCHOOLS MATTER? One of the central arguments in the text is that members of school communities engage in transactions about who is going to do what; more specifically about how actors such as teachers and students will use their ‘intangible property’ – their ‘property rights in labor’ – to carry out their respective tasks of teaching and learning. The nature of the transactions between actors in schools varies from quite formal ones, like the employment contracts of teachers and other staff, to semi-formal ones, like written statements whereby parents agree to various rules and obligations established by the school, to the most informal bargains and ‘deals’ having to do with highly subtle arrangements between people. These last can be as amorphous as a teacher talking with a student about making more of an effort, or speaking up more in class (the quid pro quo being the implication that the teacher will give approval and perhaps a better grade). Or it could be a parent agreeing to let a student have more television rights if homework is completed beforehand. Such transactions have a powerful influence on how actors perform tasks leading to the co-production of learning. What do we mean by contracts? Economist John R. Commons considered that the transaction is the most basic unit for analyzing the economics of organizations (Commons, 1934). Commons’ view of transactions ‘began with conflict of interests, then took into account the evident idea of dependence of conflicting interests on...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information