Monetary History, Exchange Rates and Financial Markets

Monetary History, Exchange Rates and Financial Markets

Essays in Honour of Charles Goodhart, Volume Two

Edited by Paul Mizen

Monetary History, Exchange Rates and Financial Markets is an impressive collection of original papers in honour of Charles Goodhart’s outstanding contribution to monetary economics and policy. Charles Goodhart has written extensively on many of these topics and has become synonymous with his field; the chapters within this book offer a summary of current thinking on his own research subjects and include perspectives on controversies surrounding them.

Chapter 1: The role of the history of economic thought in modern macroeconomics

David Laidler

Subjects: economics and finance, economic psychology, money and banking


* David Laidler 1. INTRODUCTION I intend it as a compliment to say that I do not regard Charles Goodhart as a modern macroeconomist. From the very beginning of his career, with his 1962 PhD thesis on the activities of the New York money market at the beginning of the last century (Goodhart, 1969) until now, with his work on the Wicksellian nature of modern monetary systems (Goodhart, 2002), Charles’s economics has been informed by a deep understanding of the history of monetary institutions and policy, and of the economic ideas that have underlain that history. It might appear paradoxical that this very characteristic of his intellectual equipment, which to many would seem to have suited him only for a life in the ivory tower, has also made him an important and effective policy advisor. But, as I hope to show, an approach of the type that Charles has always taken to economics is as productive and practical as it is unfashionable 2. THE STATUS OF THE HISTORY OF THOUGHT WITHIN ECONOMICS The title of a recent article by Mark Blaug (2001) succinctly and accurately describes the current status of the History of Economic Thought among economists: ‘No History of Ideas Please, We’re Economists’. One of the most distinguished of the younger generation of macroeconomists, Paul Romer, expresses the attitude that prompted Blaug’s title in the following way: ‘I guess I would describe ancestor worship as a research strategy as probably an unproductive one (laughter). But as a consumption activity...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information