Competitiveness, FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia

Competitiveness, FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia

Edited by Sanjaya Lall and Shujiro Urata

This book addresses this imbalance with new country studies on the interaction between foreign direct investment (FDI) and technological activity in building export competitiveness. The book covers China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand, highlighting different strategic approaches to building capabilities in industrial enterprises. The book also includes a general overview and studies of Japanese multinationals overseas.

Chapter 10: Can the Philippines ever catch up?

Joy V. Abrenica and Gwendolyn R. Tecson

Subjects: asian studies, asian business, asian innovation and technology, business and management, asia business, international business, economics and finance, international business, innovation and technology, asian innovation, technology and ict


Joy V. Abrenica and Gwendolyn R. Tecson INTRODUCTION Post-war industrial development in the Philippines presents a typical portrait of a developing country’s struggle to achieve technological competence. However, few countries have squandered their potential with as much profligacy as the Philippines. Despite its rich base of human capital and its early lead,1 the Philippines has performed poorly, particularly in a region where many other countries have successfully (often spectacularly) overcome similar constraints to development. Various factors have been held to account for the Philippines’ poor performance. One account blames macroeconomic mismanagement. Alternating cycles of crisis and boom are said to have engendered uncertainty and dissuaded the private sector from investing in building technological capabilities. One may, however, argue that no East Asian economy has been spared by the boom-bust cycle, though others have enjoyed longer periods of stability. Other analysts point to the failure of the state to steer the country’s technological development along a defined path (as in Korea or Taiwan) because of its liberal approach and over-dependence on market forces. However, policymaking in the Philippines has not always been liberal and marketoriented. There have been ample market interventions in the past, although they may not have been well designed or implemented. Market liberalism is of recent vintage in Philippine policymaking; the country is still in transition from an inward-looking policy environment.2 The technological lethargy of a country as well endowed with human capital as the Philippines cannot be easily explained. The boom–bust cycles certainly...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information