What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialized Nations?

What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialized Nations?

Edited by Edward N. Wolff

The contributors to this volume investigate to what extent welfare has increased in the United States over the postwar period and provide a rigorous examination of both conventional measures of the standard of living, as well as more inclusive indices. The chapters cover such topics as: race, home ownership and family structure; the status of children; the consumer price index; a historical perspective on the standard of living; worker rights and labor strength in advanced economies. In addition, they explore two economic systems delivering the goods – the free enterprise system of the United States and the European social welfare state. They then present international comparisons and highlight the relative advantages and disadvantages of these two systems.

Chapter 6: Comparing Living Standards Across Nations: Real Incomes at the Top, the Bottom, and the Middle

Timothy M. Smeeding and Lee Rainwater

Subjects: economics and finance, welfare economics, politics and public policy, public policy, social policy and sociology, sociology and sociological theory

Extract

Timothy M. Smeeding and Lee Rainwater* INTRODUCTION The types of yardsticks used by economists to measure living standards (or economic well-being across nations) are basically two. Macroeconomists use aggregate GDP per capita – a single value summary of economic output per person in a nation – to measure economic well-being. By converting currencies into comparable dollars (into real ‘purchasing-power adjusted’ terms) one creates a ‘one number per country’ measure of economic well-being. In contrast, microeconomists compare the distribution of disposable income across households to assess the distribution of economic well-being, expressed in terms of income per equivalent adult (or per equivalent child). Here the comparisons of well-being are almost always relative ‘within-nation’ comparisons of many points in the income distribution, including measures of central tendency such as the median or mean, but also the spread of incomes among people. These analyses lead to dissatisfying results from both perspectives. Real GDP per capita includes much more than is actually consumed by households, and by definition ignores the distribution of income among households (within countries). Distributions of income measure differences in sustainable consumption across the population within a country, but they are only relative and thereby ignore differences in ‘real’standards of living across countries. The usual exchange over these differences as they concern the United States runs something like this: the first analyst suggests that ‘the United States is the richest nation on earth’, the second retorts that ‘income inequality is also highest in the United States’. The first then...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information