Trade Theory, Analytical Models and Development

Trade Theory, Analytical Models and Development

Essays in Honour of Peter Lloyd, Volume I

Edited by Sisira Jayasuriya

Trade Theory, Analytical Models and Development, comprises 11 essays offering new contributions on the following topics: trade and wages; factor endowments, factor mobility and political economy of trade; optimality of tariffs; measurement of welfare; customs union theory; endogenous mergers and tariffs; intra-industry trade; state trading enterprises and trade liberalisation; general equilibrium effects of e-Commerce, and trade; economic growth with production and consumption externalities; and environmental pollution and resource degradation.

Chapter 4: On the measurement of welfare changes at second-best optima

Kunio Kawamata

Subjects: economics and finance, international economics


Kunio Kawamata 1. INTRODUCTION When not all of the agents in an economy act on a common efficiency price vector (which is proportional to the vector of marginal rates of substitution whenever the latter exists), the allocation is not Pareto-optimal under the standard assumptions about the economic environment, including the convexity of preferences and technologies and the non-existence of external economies. The price distortion as described above is an unavoidable consequence of sales taxes and monopolistic pricing. Allais (1973) and Debreu (1951), among others, defined a measure of welfare loss in a non-optimal state by the proportion of the initial resources that would be unnecessary if the distortions were completely removed (see also Kawamata, 1974). There are also related measures of loss based on the second-order derivatives of the welfare function evaluated at the initial optimal point (see Hotelling, 1938; Boiteaux, 1951; and Harberger, 1964). The relationships among these and some other measures of loss are discussed by Diewert (1981). The chief purpose of this chapter is to evaluate the welfare change from one second-best position to another when there takes place a small change in the distortionary constraint of the model. We measure the loss by the amount of a single good, say the numeraire, that would just compensate for a one-unit change in the distortionary constraint. Clearly, the idea underlying this measure is quite similar to those of Debreu and Allais. Diewert (1981) conjectured that the welfare loss will increase if substitutability in consumption increases. A...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information