Institutions, Innovation and Growth

Institutions, Innovation and Growth

Selected Economic Papers

The Cournot Centre series

Edited by Jean-Philippe Touffut

The first book in this important new series, under the general editorship of Nobel Laureate Robert Solow, Institutions, Innovation and Growth assembles a stellar cast of international contributors. Leading economists join the debate on innovation and economic growth, focussing on a broad spectrum of issues ranging from labour markets to corporate governance. Growth paths within the OECD are also assessed, with particular emphasis on contrasts between US and European models. The book seeks to identify those institutional factors, taking into account different national trajectories, which might serve to promote economic growth in Europe.

Chapter 6: Empirical estimates of the relationship between product market competition and innovation

Philippe Aghion

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, industrial economics, innovation and technology, economics of innovation


Philippe Aghion 1 INTRODUCTION Both the theoretical industrial organization (IO) literature and the more recent endogenous growth literature have raised the issue of the relationship between product market competition (PMC) and innovation or productivity growth. The theoretical IO literature predicts that innovation and growth should decline with competition, because more competition reduces the monopoly rents that reward entry by new successful innovators. On the other hand, empirical work has pointed to a positive correlation between product market competition and innovative output. Several theoretical attempts have been made to reconcile the Schumpeterian paradigm with the evidence provided in these studies generating various predictions as to the shape of the relationship between PMC and productivity growth. In particular, Aghion et al. (1997) and Aghion et al. (2001) extended the basic Schumpeterian model by allowing incumbent firms to innovate. In these models, innovation incentives depend not so much upon post-innovation rents per se, but more upon the difference between post-innovation and pre-innovation rents. (The latter were equal to zero in the basic model where all innovations were made by outsiders.) In this case, more PMC may end up fostering innovation and growth, as it may reduce a firm’s pre-innovation rents more than it reduces post-innovation rents. In other words, competition may increase the incremental profits from innovating, and thereby encourage R&D investments aimed at ‘escaping competition’. Hence the possibility of a positive correlation between PMC and productivity growth. Does this mean that the Schumpeterian effect highlighted in earlier models disappears and that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information