Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education

Recruitment, Retention and Retirement in Higher Education

Building and Managing the Faculty of the Future

Edited by Robert L. Clark and Jennifer Ma

This volume examines some of the most pressing employment and compensation issues confronting academic administrators. Contributors discuss topics such as: ageing of faculty, changing economic conditions and shifts in faculty employment patterns, rapid increases in health care costs and trends in retiree health insurance, and adoption of phased and early retirement programs.

Chapter 14: Recruitment, retention and retirement: institutional research and the need for data

Michael A. Baer, Deborah A. Freund, Chalotte v. Kuh and Richard R. Spies

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of education, public sector economics, education, economics of education


Michael A. Baer, Deborah A. Freund, Charlotte V. Kuh, David E. Shulenburger and Richard R. Spies There is a long-standing need for research to inform administrative or institutional policy decisions that too often tend to be based on assumptions or ‘conventional wisdom’ with little or no supporting data. As issues involving faculty recruitment, retention, and retirement become increasingly urgent, the advantages of having a repository of data on these matters based on shared institutional research are clear. To establish such a resource will require developing or inventing better ways to measure the effectiveness of faculty employment policies in light of immediate and long-term institutional goals. While the need for this research is apparent, defining or identifying its exact nature presents a challenge. At this point in the history of higher education and the professoriate, it is difficult to know exactly what questions researchers should be posing. That was not always the case. As recently as the late 1980s and early 1990s, the questions were more direct: what for instance should (or could) be done about the impending elimination of mandatory retirement for faculty? Indeed, with the growth in adjunct and part-time faculty, the definition of a faculty member has blurred. The issues have become more subtle and open-ended, and the possible solutions more complicated and less prescriptive. The TIAA-CREF Institute conference on the Three Rs shed considerable light on these issues, while making apparent the extensive resources available through TIAA-CREF and its affiliates to develop programs...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information