Table of Contents

Research Handbook on International Law and Migration

Research Handbook on International Law and Migration

Research Handbooks in International Law series

Edited by Vincent Chetail and Céline Bauloz

Migration is a complex and multifaceted issue, and the current legal framework suffers from considerable ambiguity and lack of cohesive focus. This Handbook offers a comprehensive take on the intersection of law and migration studies and provides strategies for better understanding the potential of international legal norms in regulating migration. Authoritative analyses by the most renowned and knowledgeable experts in the field focus on important migration issues and challenge the current normative framework with new ways of thinking about the topic.

Chapter 16: The mandate of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

T. Alexander Aleinikoff

Subjects: development studies, migration, law - academic, human rights, public international law, politics and public policy, human rights, social policy and sociology, migration, urban and regional studies, migration


The editors of this volume asked me to prepare a chapter on 'the mandate' of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The perceptive reader might well ask why this is an interesting topic. Might it not simply yield a chapter consisting of citations to a plethora of General Assembly Resolutions that over a 60-year period have asked UNHCR to perform certain functions relating to refugees and other displaced persons, or perhaps a description of where, when and how UNHCR has acted in the world - with some prediction about future theatres of action? Or it might be suggested that what is relevant in discussing agency action is the issue of 'legal authority', which can be answered in lawyerly fashion by consulting the usual sources of legal competence. The term mandate seems to muddy the water; it is found neither in UNHCR's founding documents nor is there a firmly established definition of the term in international practice. But lack of clarity has not produced an apparent disincentive to usage. Indeed, it may be that because the term - both its meaning and scope - is unclear that it is rather regularly wielded in discussions of what international organizations can and should do. Even for an organization as well-established as UNHCR, the mandate question remains surprisingly lively. It is raised both within the organization and by members of UNHCR's Executive Committee, as the Office continues to respond to the needs of displaced persons under changing world circumstances.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information