Table of Contents

Handbook on East Asian Social Policy

Handbook on East Asian Social Policy

Elgar original reference

Edited by Misa Izuhara

Dramatic socio-economic transformations over the last two decades have brought social policy and social welfare issues to prominence in many East Asian societies. Since the 1990s and in response to national as well as global pressure, there have been substantial developments and reforms in social policy in the region but the development paths have been uneven. Until recently, comparative analysis of East Asian social policy tends to have focused on the established welfare state of Japan and the emerging welfare regimes of four ‘Tiger Economies’. Much of the recent debate indeed preceded China’s re-emergence onto the world economy. In this context, this Handbook brings China more fully into the contemporary social policy debates in East Asia. Organised around five themes from welfare state developments, to theories and methodologies, to current social policy issues, the Handbook presents original research from leading specialists in the fields, and provides a fresh and updated perspective to the study of social policy.

Chapter 17: Qualitative research on family generations in changing East Asian societies

Misa Izuhara and Ray Forrest

Subjects: asian studies, asian development, asian politics and policy, asian social policy, development studies, asian development, politics and public policy, asian politics, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy


Social surveys producing ‘hard data’ or numerical statistical analysis may still be the dominant East Asian research method in social research. Different research questions, however, require different research methods and approaches, and thus either qualitative or quantitative approaches may be suitable methods of inquiry. At the same time, such a dichotomy of employing a qualitative or quantitative method may not be helpful in many social research contexts, since those methods often complement each other’s limitations; nonetheless, adhering to a strict dichotomy of either qualitative or quantitative research can produce limited research findings. Therefore a combination of both approaches is vital for issues in social research to be fully explored and understood (Critcher, Waddington and Dicks, 1999). Survey research, for example, may not provide the contextual detail necessary for the interpretation of the responses, and thus it is useful to include the ethnographic basis of the statistics produced by the survey (Gephart, 1988). A qualitative method of inquiry is an effective tool to reveal many aspects of social life and to construct meaningful knowledge (or understand the way in which the respondents construct meaning) which quantitative approaches would find hard to capture. Indeed, the strengths of the methodology lie in its power of interpretation, description and explanation of social phenomena rather than in its ability to generalize or answer causal questions (see, for example, Silverman, 2004; Yoshii, 2006; Stake, 2010).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information