Elgar original reference
Edited by Roger W. Garrison and Norman Barry
Chapter 13: Spontaneous order, free trade and globalization
One of the interesting ironies of the resurgence of interest in the work of Friedrich Hayek in the last few decades is that he had very little to say about one of the most controversial economic issues of our time, namely the heightened importance and visibility of international trade. So-called ‘globalization’ remains a hotly contested issue and one that creates unusual coalitions on all sides. As Virginia Postrel (1998) argued, one way of viewing the debate over globalization is between ‘dynamists’ who do not fear uncontrolled and unplanned evolution and change, and ‘stasists’, who see only the costs of such change and attempt to limit it. The result is an unusual coalition in opposition to globalization that comes from the protectionist right and the ‘progressive’ left, with the former seeing only harm to the Western working class and the latter seeing globalization (or at least what they would call ‘corporate-led’ globalization) as impoverishing the developing world, both materially and culturally, by turning it into mini-Americas. What is striking about Postrel’s framework is that it can be read in Hayekian terms even though Hayek himself had little to say on the issues at hand. Hayek’s relative silence on international trade is a curious phenomenon in and of itself. One suspects that there are two major explanations.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.