Does Economic Governance Matter?

Does Economic Governance Matter?

Governance Institutions and Outcomes

New Directions in Modern Economics series

Edited by Mehmet Ugur and David Sunderland

This book contributes to the growing governance literature in three ways. First, it extends the analysis to new areas such as power asymmetry, regulation, transnational company strategies, and law enforcement. Secondly, it examines the role of formal institutions that shape and enforce the rules/norms codified in law; but also private-ordering institutions that function under the umbrella of the State; and private institutions (such as market rules/norms) that provide reputational and other information that foster compliance. Finally, the book extends and enriches the governance debate, addressing issues such as the determinants of institutional quality and efficiency, and the interaction between actor networks and institutional norms.

Chapter 9: The Political Economy of Deregulation in the US Gas Distribution Market

Vladimir Hlasny

Subjects: business and management, corporate governance, economics and finance, corporate governance, institutional economics, political economy, politics and public policy, political economy

Extract

Vladimir Hlasny Since the late 1800s, regulation of public utilities in the United States has undergone many changes in structure and conceptual approach. The most recent upheaval took place in the early 1990s, when state-level public service commissions abandoned traditional cost-plus ratemaking regime for performance-based regulation. Some states fixed prices that utilities could charge, some introduced financial incentives for utilities to exceed certain performance standards, and others allowed utilities to compete among themselves for customers. Utilities went along with, if not welcomed, the changes. The first large incentive programs in the gas distribution industry were introduced 15 years ago, and many states have adopted them since then. As of 2007, half of US states and two-thirds of utilities still operated under rate-of-return regulation. To this day, motives behind regulatory reform across individual states remain unclear. Understanding them can help us determine the relative importance of legitimate economic factors, and of political capture motives, in bringing about policy reform. This understanding can also help us predict future patterns of deregulation. This chapter extends empirical evidence on factors behind regulatory reform in utility industries, using panel data on all natural-gas utilities in the continental United States. Among state-level political factors, frequency and timing of commissioner re-elections, system of selection of commissioners and party composition of the commissions and state legislatures are significant in explaining the pattern of deregulation. Demonstration effects from regulatory regimes in surrounding states and particularly from other utility industries in a state appear to play a role. A negative...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information