The Age of Central Banks

The Age of Central Banks

Curzio Giannini

Curzio Giannini’s history of the evolution of central banks illustrates how the most relevant institutional developments have taken place at times of widespread confidence crises and in response to deflationary pressures. The eminent and highly-renowned author provides an analytical perspective to study the evolution of central banking as an endogenous response to crisis and to the ever increasing needs of economic growth. The key argument of the analysis is that crucial innovations in the payment technology (from the invention of coinage to the development of electronic money) could not have taken place without an institution – i.e. the central bank - that could preserve confidence in the instruments used as money. According to Curzio Giannini’s ‘neo-institutionalist’ methodological approach, social institutions are, in fact, essential in the coordination of individual decisions as they minimize transaction costs, overcome information asymmetries and deal with incomplete contracts.

Chapter 4: Bank Money and Instability: From Bagehot’s Principle to Financial Regulation

Curzio Giannini

Subjects: economics and finance, money and banking

Extract

4.1 INTRODUCTION One of the guiding principles of the English model was that an issuing institution, whether operating as a monopoly or not, should behave like any other bank, freely seeking maximum profit, as long as it respected the legal limit on the quantity of banknotes issued. Sir Robert Peel, presenting the bill that would later become the Bank Charter Act of 1844, had explicitly exhorted the Bank of England to only serve the interests of profit, while the law would safeguard public interest. The reason for separating the Bank of England’s note issue and banking departments was to protect paper currency from the operations that the banking department would legitimately undertake, not in the public interest but solely in that of its own shareholders, in competition with the other banking houses in the English market. The various versions of the English model all observed this guiding principle, despite many differences of other kinds. Indeed, in some cases, such as that of the Second Bank of the United States, it was precisely the overly paternalistic attitude of the main note-issuing institution towards the rest of the banking system that tipped the political balance in favour of a system of regulated competition. However, the aim of reconciling public and private interests, enshrined in the 1844 law and in all other legislation it inspired, was not achieved in practice. The mechanism could have worked if the needs of the economy had not called for a steady increase in the money supply. Such...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information