Table of Contents

Handbook of Multilevel Finance

Handbook of Multilevel Finance

Edited by Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio

This Handbook explores and explains new developments in the “second generation” theory of public finance, in which benevolent rulers and governments have been replaced by personally motivated politicians and the associated institutions. Following a comprehensive introduction by the editors, the renowned contributors present fresh and original perspectives on the key multi-level issues, along with recent developments in theory and practice, as they relate to taxes, budget systems, the management of liabilities and macroeconomic stability. The book also explores special issues concerning the poor and marginalized, structural change and the environment, natural disasters, and the task of overcoming conflicts whilst keeping countries together.

Chapter 24: The challenge of measuring fiscal decentralization

Hansjörg Blöchliger

Subjects: economics and finance, public finance, public sector economics

Extract

Fiscal federalism data providers have a dismal life. Most academic papers in the area start with an apology for bad data quality and then continue by saying that there are no alternatives, sometimes justifying unpleasant empirical results with the paucity of data. Indeed, data limits often prevent relevant analysis of intergovernmental fiscal frameworks and how they affect outcomes such as fiscal sustainability; economic growth; the distribution of wealth across jurisdictions; public sector efficiency; or citizen’s satisfaction. There are a number of traditional indicators like sub-central spending or revenue shares that can give a first impression of sub-central autonomy in a country. Datasets such as the OECD National Accounts or the IMF Government Statistics cover both a large set of countries and – at least for some countries – a considerable time span, and they serve and have been serving for most empirical analysis dealing with fiscal decentralization. Yet the academics’ grievances about relevance and reliability of decentralization data are understandable to some extent: the traditional measures do not always measure what they are supposed to. Simple tax revenue ratios do not necessarily reflect true power of sub-central governments over tax policy. Spending shares may even be highly misleading if they are taken as a surrogate of fiscal autonomy, to the extent that central government exerts strict control on sub-central spending. Tax and spending constraints are not the only source for low sub-central government (SCG) autonomy.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information