Table of Contents

Comparative Law and Economics

Comparative Law and Economics

Research Handbooks in Comparative Law series

Edited by Theodore Eisenberg and Giovanni B. Ramello

Contemporary law and economics has greatly expanded its scope of inquiry as well as its sphere of influence. The extension to many idiosyncratic topics and issues that sometime lie outside the traditional domain of the discipline have fostered the emergence of a new consciousness better grasped by a comparative approach. The original contributions to this Research Handbook provide a glimpse of the new perspectives that enrich the law and economics methodology.

Chapter 7: A comparative view of local tax and expenditure limitations and their consequences

Federico Revelli

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, comparative law, law and economics


The size and growth of the local public sector in democratic, multi-tiered structures of government are the outcomes of the decentralized political process, subject to the fiscal rules set by upper – typically, national and state in unitary and federal countries respectively – tiers of government. Quite frequently, besides establishing local governments’ domain of competencies, own revenue sources or even the conditions for the very existence of municipal/county tiers (a manifestation of the so-called Dillon’s rule in the US local government system, and the de jure or de facto status of local governments in most European countries) those rules contain a number of limitations and obligations that considerably restrict the actual fiscal autonomy of local governments. Importantly, and partly as a result of the financial crisis of the late 2000s as discussed below, those restrictive fiscal institutions have been playing an increasing role across the developed world in the most recent years. This chapter focuses in particular on the genesis and consequences of tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) on local governments (multi-purpose authorities as municipalities, counties or provinces, as well as one-purpose districts), offering a comparison of this sort of intergovernmental fiscal arrangements in the amply studied and debated US case, and across some relevant experiences in the countries of Europe that are virtually ignored in academic research.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information