Poor Leadership and Bad Governance

Poor Leadership and Bad Governance

Reassessing Presidents and Prime Ministers in North America, Europe and Japan

New Horizons in Leadership Studies series

Edited by Ludger Helms

Focusing on the presidents and prime ministers of the G8 – the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Russia and Japan – it explores the complex relationship between weak and ineffective leadership, undemocratic leadership techniques, and bad policies from a broad comparative perspective. What makes leaders weak or bad in different contexts? What are the consequences of their actions and behaviour? And has there been any learning from negative experience? These questions are at the centre of this fascinating joint inquiry that involves a team of truly distinguished leadership scholars.

Chapter 6: Revisiting the German Chancellorship: Leadership Weakness and Democratic Autocracy in the Federal Republic

Ludger Helms

Subjects: business and management, business leadership, politics and public policy, leadership


Ludger Helms Exploring manifestations of poor leadership and bad governance in post-war Germany may appear to be a far-fetched idea. Like few other countries in the Western world, the Federal Republic has been considered a major, if unlikely, success story – not only in terms of political stability but also in terms of policy performance, including, in particular, economic growth and public welfare. Paradoxically, the ‘German miracle’ was to a large extent the result of German political history before 1945, or what the actors in charge after World War II made of it. Indeed, as Manfred G. Schmidt has suggested, Germany’s way of dealing with its own past has been very much an exercise in ‘learning from catastrophes’ (Schmidt 1989). The German constitution-makers of the early post-war period, and the Allied powers supporting them, took the lessons that the conflict-ridden Weimar Republic (1919–33) and the ensuing Nazi regime (1933–45) had taught them, seriously. They designed a constitution that would contain numerous institutional safeguards against any form of political tyranny and unfettered majority rule, including a federal order, an independent central bank, a constitutional court as well as a powerful second chamber. These constitutional choices were accompanied by fortunate developments at the level of interest groups and the party system. Especially the emergence of two major people’s parties, the Christian Democrats and Social Democrats, was to become the political bedrock of German postwar democracy. These favourable political and institutional patterns combined with a particular set of ideas and traditions (such...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information