Table of Contents

Creative Knowledge Cities

Creative Knowledge Cities

Myths, Visions and Realities

New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Marina van Geenhuizen and Peter Nijkamp

This book adopts a holistic, integrated and pragmatic approach to exploring the myths, concepts, policies, key conditions and tools for enhancing creative knowledge cities, as well as expounding potentially negative impacts of knowledge based city policies.

Chapter 13: Interlocking Firm Networks in the German Knowledge Economy: The Case of the Emerging Mega-city Region of Munich

Alain Thierstein and Stefan Lüthi

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, regional economics, innovation and technology, economics of innovation, knowledge management, urban and regional studies, cities, regional economics


Alain Thierstein and Stefan Lüthi INTRODUCTION Globalization has entailed a reorganization of spatial development processes on a global, European, national and regional scale. New forms of hierarchical and network development and functional differentiation between cities can be observed (Friedmann, 1986; Sassen, 2001). Scott (2001) and, recently, Hall and Pain (2006) argue that cities cannot be separated from their regional hinterlands as they often compose a functional division of labour in terms of different kinds of services and value chains among firms (Scott, 2001; Hall and Pain, 2006). Hence, the traditional hierarchical model of a core city dominating its urban hinterland is becoming increasingly obsolete. Instead, a process of selective decentralization of particular urban functions, and the simultaneous concentration of others, has led to the emergence of polycentric mega-city regions (Kloosterman and Musterd, 2001; Thierstein et al., 2008). This emerging urban form is spread out over a large area containing a number of cities more or less within commuting distance, and one or more international airports that link the region with other parts of the world (Hoyler et al., 2008). Different attempts have been made to handle these extended urban regions analytically, and a variety of research projects and publications concerned with polycentricity on a city-regional scale has been produced (ESPON, 2004; Duhr, 2005; Hall and Pain, 2006; Thierstein et al., 2006; Built Environment, vol. 32 (2), 2006; Regional Studies, vol. 42 (8), 2008). Furthermore, a number of labels have been used to denote the identified new metropolitan form (Hoyler...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information