Table of Contents

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Spatially Integrated Social Science

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Spatially Integrated Social Science

Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications series

Edited by Robert Stimson

The chapters in this book provide coverage of the theoretical underpinnings and methodologies that typify research using a Spatially Integrated Social Science (SISS) approach. This insightful Handbook is intended chiefly as a primer for students and budding researchers who wish to investigate social, economic and behavioural phenomena by giving explicit consideration to the roles of space and place. The majority of chapters provide an emphasis on demonstrating applications of methods, tools and techniques that are used in SISS research, including long-established and relatively new approaches.

Chapter 10: Qualitative methods in socio-spatial research

Phillip O’Neill and Pauline McGuirk

Subjects: economics and finance, regional economics, geography, economic geography, environmental geography, human geography, research methods in geography, research methods, research methods in economics, research methods in geography, urban and regional studies, regional economics, research methods in urban and regional studies


This chapter explores the rationale for qualitative methods, the origins of qualitative research, and a number of important issues relating to the conduct of qualitative research. The chapter is not intended to be a comprehensive guide to qualitative methods in socio-spatial research. Rather its intention is to stimulate the reader’s interest in qualitative methods and encourage their pursuit in a rigorous, effective manner. Comprehensive guides and key references to qualitative methods can be found in Crang (2003), Hall (2001) and Herbert et al. (2009). While the use of qualitative methods in the social sciences has a long history, in the context of a spatially integrated social science it was in the 1980s and 1990s that they were more widely developed as an alternative way to make observations, collect and analyse data, and create new knowledge. The impetus for this arose from widespread dissatisfaction among some researchers with positive empiricism as the dominant form of research inquiry in the social sciences. It also arose from the desire of many researchers that their work make more direct connections with projects seeking to enhance both distributive and non-distributive forms of justice and the empowerment of marginalized groups.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information