Table of Contents

Handbook of the International Political Economy of Governance

Handbook of the International Political Economy of Governance

Handbooks of Research on International Political Economy series

Edited by Anthony Payne and Nicola Phillips

Since the 1990s many of the assumptions that anchored the study of governance in international political economy (IPE) have been shaken loose. Reflecting on the intriguing and important processes of change that have occurred, and are occurring, Professors Anthony Payne and Nicola Phillips bring together the best research currently being undertaken in the field. They explore the complex ways that the global political economy is presently being governed, and indeed misgoverned.

Chapter 22: Migration in European governance: the constitution of a transgovernmental policy field

Andrew Geddes

Subjects: economics and finance, political economy, politics and public policy, international politics, political economy, regulation and governance

Extract

This chapter analyses the relationship between the social, political and economic constitution of 'the European project' and the governance of migration. It does so in the context of what the European Union (EU) now calls its Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM) (see CEC 2011a). This has both an 'internal' governance dimension applied to the 28 member-states and an 'external' governance dimension as it affects non-member-states. The chapter seeks to account for the development of EU migration governance, its links to the broader political economy of European integration, and the particular policy focus within both its internal and its external dimensions. It thus asks why, how and with what effects the EU has developed common migration policies and a system of migration governance. The EU's GAMM built on what was initially called a Global Approach to Migration, which emerged during the UK's presidency of the EU in 2005. The addition of the word 'mobility' may seem like a marginal difference, but is significant in the development of EU migration governance because of the distinction it creates between 'virtuous' mobility (involving the highly qualified and economically beneficial forms of migration) which, it is argued, should be encouraged, and more 'problematic' migration, which is to be controlled and restricted. Increased emphasis within this debate has been placed on temporary and circular forms of migration.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information