Redesigning Management Education and Research

Redesigning Management Education and Research

Challenging Proposals from European Scholars

Edited by Stephanie Dameron and Thomas Durand

The field of management education and research has become an industry of its own – an industry with fierce international competition in a global arena. Here, the authors argue that a series of mechanisms has led to mimicking and thus strategic convergence among business schools. The authors further argue that this has resulted in a loss of relevance and diversity of the management knowledge produced and taught in a multipolar world. They view this as counterproductive to business schools, students, firms, societies and other stakeholders, including scholars themselves.

Chapter 1: Social Sciences and Management Sciences: Convergences or Divergences?

Eric Godelier

Subjects: business and management, management education, management and universities, research methods in business and management, education, management and universities, management education, research methods, research methods in business and management


Eric Godelier Regularly in France, management sciences are criticised by several categories of people. Within the discipline, academics from different epistemological traditions debate the question of how scientific they are. They also try to define the best way of doing research in order to be fully recognised by universities and business schools or by other scientific fields of ‘pure’ sciences, such as physics and mathematics, or social sciences, such as sociology, history and (sometimes) economics. Outside the frontiers of management, academics aim to convince both the public and corporate managers that their science can legitimately speak about corporations and can improve the quality and efficiency of management tools and models. Behind the public discussion, there are various aspects involved. One cornerstone on which many of the debates focused is the complex relationship between management and social sciences. Seen as critical or unhelpful in practice, classical social sciences – for instance political economy, sociology, anthropology or history – may be rejected either by management academics or by practitioners. For them, the orientation of management sciences towards theoretical research or ‘useless’ knowledge seems suspect. Hence, claiming that, as a new discipline, management sciences have to break with their renowned antecedents, some management academics minimise or reject any methodological or epistemological influence. How and when did this complex relationship with social sciences come about? Is it possible to create what some hold to be a totally new discipline from scratch? This means that, at least theoretically, a new community and its scientific paradigm could be...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information