Redesigning Management Education and Research

Redesigning Management Education and Research

Challenging Proposals from European Scholars

Edited by Stephanie Dameron and Thomas Durand

The field of management education and research has become an industry of its own – an industry with fierce international competition in a global arena. Here, the authors argue that a series of mechanisms has led to mimicking and thus strategic convergence among business schools. The authors further argue that this has resulted in a loss of relevance and diversity of the management knowledge produced and taught in a multipolar world. They view this as counterproductive to business schools, students, firms, societies and other stakeholders, including scholars themselves.

Chapter 5: Redesigning Business Management Education: Functional Silos versus Cross-functional Views – A Historical and Social Perspective

Bernard de Montmorillon

Subjects: business and management, management education, management and universities, research methods in business and management, education, management and universities, management education, research methods, research methods in business and management

Extract

Bernard de Montmorillon Few business concepts have as complex an evolution, as diverse a profile and as problematic a current status as management itself – factors that in turn call for a redesign of management education. When Chester Barnard published his landmark book Functions of the Executive in 1938, he drew from his own long and rich career experience. Formerly president of the New Jersey Bell Telephone Company, Barnard was also a public administrator (Barabel 2002). As the book’s title indicates, he focuses on those who make business organisations function, make decisions and steer the enterprise, identified henceforth as ‘managers’ in this chapter. The business enterprise under discussion here is any form of ‘collective productive project’: a ‘project’ because enterprise, from the Old French entreprendre, literally means a bold undertaking; ‘collective’ because the organisation depends on people cooperating with one another; and ‘productive’ because it creates commercial goods or services for others. Barnard’s dual skills converge in the importance he ascribes to two conditions of a business enterprise’s survival: effectiveness and efficiency. ‘Effectiveness’ follows the classic definition: a firm’s ability to achieve stated goals. In contrast, Barnard defined organisational efficiency as the degree to which an organisation is able to satisfy the expectations or motives of its individuals (employees or members), rather than referring to production cost savings, as we do today. His approach was taken up and expanded upon 20 years later by March and Simon (1958) in their equally important book Organizations. These insights furthered understanding of the manager’s...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information