Chapter 10: Passing off and unfair competition regimes compared
With respect to both registered and unregistered trademarks, there is a distinct cultural difference between legal regimes that give primary importance to the policy of preventing consumer deception, and those that treat this goal as subsumed within the larger goal of regulating competition. For the most part, the narrower goal of consumer protection predominates in the common law countries, while civil law countries have embraced the broader concept of unfair competition. However, approaches to competition are more nuanced than this, and such a two-part classification oversimplifies the cultural conflict. Within the common law and civil law sectors, there are a variety of approaches, and some common law jurisdictions have interpreted the common law doctrine of passing off more broadly than others, although stopping short of a full-fledged law of unfair competition. In general, the approach of civil law countries elevates the goal of fairness above that of competition and has thus been criticized as anticompetitive. The common law approach tends to make competition the primary goal, treating fairness as a consideration only when a competitor’s conduct is particularly extreme. Such extreme conduct may be found, for example, where the competitor’s actions are likely to mislead or confuse consumers about the origin or nature of the goods on offer.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.