Table of Contents

Knowledge Management and Intellectual Property

Knowledge Management and Intellectual Property

Concepts, Actors and Practices from the Past to the Present

Queen Mary Studies in Intellectual Property series

Edited by Stathis Arapostathis and Graham Dutfield

The book links the practices and regimes of the past with those of contemporary and emerging forms, covering the mid-19th century to the present. The contributors are noted scholars from various disciplines including history of science and technology, intellectual property law, and innovation studies. The chapters offer original perspectives on how proprietary regimes in knowledge production processes have developed as a socio-political phenomenon of modernity, as well as providing an analysis of the way individuals, institutions and techno-sciences interact within this culture.

Chapter 2: Managing invention: Setting the boundaries of ownership

Andrea R. Maestrejuan

Subjects: business and management, knowledge management, innovation and technology, knowledge management, law - academic, intellectual property law

Extract

By the end of the nineteenth century, German firms were changing the face of invention. The world of the workshop in which the lone inventor toiled in vain was giving way to the industrial research laboratory staffed by a fleet of for-hire employee-inventors. Invention, as one scholar has described it, had become ‘industrialized’ (Meyer-Thurow, 1982). While German independent inventors remained a significant source of new technology, firms became increasingly important players in the generation of new technology. The success of firms in achieving significant advantages by combining inventive activity with the commercial exploitation of the patented technology by creating in-house research and development laboratories is well documented (Lamoreaux and Sokoloff, 2005a; 2005b). Even before unification and the adoption of a national patent law to encourage inventive activity, German firms had already ‘borrowed’ extensively from technology developed in other countries to ‘catch up’. At the same time, German states were introducing educational reforms to create a formally educated class of specialists trained in R & D. When the first national patent law was finally passed, firms were already employing these highly educated workers to routinize improvements in technology and to rely less on technology developed outside of the firm. These advantages are particularly true of the German dyestuff and pharmaceutical industry. Scholars use the emergence of the German chemical industry during the nineteenth century as a key example of the success of the corporate research laboratory to propel Germany down its ‘peculiar’ path of rapid industrialization by the mid-nineteenth century.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information