Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications series
Edited by Peter Karl Kresl and Jaime Sobrino
Chapter 5: A comparative approach to doing research on cities: comparing North American cities to others
We want to highlight here the interest of the comparative method in doing research on cities, as in our view it is amongst the best ways to understand local and regional development and to highlight the specificities of particular developments in the North American context as in others. This comparative study shows how the process of territorial and urban renewal concretely transforms formally industrial spaces. First of all, we show that these cases of policies of territorial and socio-economic regeneration produce a real renewal on a local scale, and not only represent discontinuous projects which are not integrated in terms of innovative socio-economic revitalization. Our comparative study on Montreal and Barcelona’s innovation districts highlights the main factors of a city’s regeneration, and permit a demonstration of the usefulness of the comparative method for research on cities, as one of the most fruitful methods to highlight specificities in urban research but also to develop strategies for new revitalization projects, as is the case in Montreal.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.