Table of Contents

Handbook of the Politics of the Arctic

Handbook of the Politics of the Arctic

Edited by Leif Christian Jensen and Geir Hønneland

The Arctic has again become one of the leading issues on the international foreign policy agenda, in a manner unseen since the Cold War. Drawing on the perspectives of geo-politics and international law, this Handbook offers fresh insights and perspectives on the most pressing issues, grouped under the headings of political ascendancy, climate and environmental issues, resources and energy, and the response and policies of affected countries.

Chapter 10: Maritime limits and boundaries in the Arctic Ocean: agreements and disputes

Ted L. McDorman and Clive Schofield

Subjects: environment, environmental law, environmental politics and policy, law - academic, environmental law, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, international politics

Extract

The Arctic Ocean, understood here as the body of water north of the Arctic Circle, has been the focus of significant political and media attention over most of the last decade. The six coastal states in the region – Canada, Denmark (Greenland), Iceland, Norway, the Russian Federation and the United States – have long been asserting and exercising their jurisdictional rights in the Arctic Ocean pursuant to the international law of the sea and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention), to which all these states, except the United States, are parties. This is the case notwithstanding perceptions that the Arctic is a case apart. There is no doubt that the Arctic Ocean, especially the central Arctic Ocean (the area north of Alaska, the Canadian Arctic islands, Greenland, Svalbard and the Russian Federation), is a unique, sensitive and relatively pristine marine environment. The Arctic region also has special characteristics – for example, in relation to the nature of some of its coastal populations and the impact of developments in the environment (global climate change) on global weather, sea-levels, ocean currents, ice-cover, and so forth. Nevertheless, all the Arctic littoral states have advanced maritime jurisdictional claims off their Arctic coasts and into the Arctic Ocean that are consistent with the LOS Convention and in keeping with maritime claims made elsewhere in the world ocean.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information