Good Government

Good Government

The Relevance of Political Science

Edited by Sören Holmberg and Bo Rothstein

In all societies, the quality of government institutions is of the utmost importance for the well-being of its citizens. Problems like high infant mortality, lack of access to safe water, unhappiness and poverty are not primarily caused by a lack of technical equipment, effective medicines or other types of knowledge generated by the natural or engineering sciences. Instead, the critical problem is that the majority of the world’s population live in societies that have dysfunctional government institutions. Central issues discussed in the book include: how can good government be conceptualized and measured, what are the effects of ‘bad government’ and how can the quality of government be improved?

Chapter 9: Do International Organizations Promote Quality of Government?

Monika Bauhr and Naghmeh Nasiritousi

Subjects: development studies, development studies, politics and public policy, international politics, political economy, public policy, regulation and governance

Extract

Monika Bauhr and Naghmeh Nasiritousi In 1998, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan identified good governance as “perhaps the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting development” (Annan 1998). Following the growing consensus on the detrimental effects of bad government institutions (Mauro 1995; Evans and Rauch 1999; OECD 2001; Rothstein and Teorell 2008), several international organizations (IOs) have undertaken the task to address problems of bad quality of government (QoG) in member states as a matter of urgency. By virtue of their political and economic strengths, IOs are often expected to have the means to spread norms of appropriate behavior. However, the evidence presented so far on successes in this field has been mixed. While broad empirical studies have confirmed the link between international integration and reduced levels of corruption (Sandholtz and Gray 2003), numerous case studies fail to find a positive link between IO engagement and better government institutions (Kelley 2004; Schimmelfennig 2005). One reason for this is the lack of systematic understanding of the different pitfalls that IOs may encounter when engaging with member states. Past studies have explained failures in IOs’ strategies by looking at conditions at the recipient end of the targeted action. Thus the focus has predominantly been on hampering circumstances within the member country, such as lack of political will or the weakness of institutions (Dollar and Svensson 2000). While such explanations are in many cases important, they are inadequate for explaining failures by IOs to promote norms. This is because it is a...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information