Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Entrepreneurship and Small Business

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Entrepreneurship and Small Business

Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications series

Edited by Alan Carsrud and Malin Brännback

This thought provoking book builds on existing research traditions that make small business, entrepreneurship and family business a resource rich arena for study. It steps back to ask fundamental questions that every researcher should consider prior to engaging in data collection. It focuses on topics that have traditionally frustrated researchers including experimental methods in small business research, scale development, control variables and language issues in cross cultural research.

Chapter 8: Cross-cultural studies in entrepreneurship: a note on culture and language

Malin Brännback, Stefan Lång, Alan Carsrud and Siri Terjesen

Subjects: business and management, entrepreneurship, family business, research methods in business and management, research methods, research methods in business and management


The field of international business (IB) emerged after World War II to capture phenomena in international trade and foreign direct investments. During the 1950s, the IB field added the cross-cultural perspective to its repertoire as it was widely recognized that national cultures differ and thus could impact management processes (Brannen and Doz, 2010). Early cross-cultural studies primarily studied demographic and economic variables and how these differed on a national level. Later cross-cultural issues on an organizational level became interesting with the conceptualization of multinational corporations (MNCs). These studies were primarily concerned with issues related to cross-cultural psychology and intercultural communication that management had to deal with. One of the best-known studies on how cultures vary across nations and its implications in the MNC context is Hofstede's (1980) classic study. However, the culture construct remains poorly defined or, to be more precise, continues to be defined in a myriad of ways. The prevailing understanding has been that culture was something 'out there', external to the individual, often nurturing an 'us versus them' logic. Most studies followed the positivistic ontology where culture was viewed as etic or universal, objective, measurable and relatively static (Schaffer and Riordan, 2003; Brannen and Doz, 2010; Usunier, 2011). Culture was primarily treated as a group-level construct (i.e. nation, organization), although culture is created by individual behaviors. Brannen and Doz (2010) point out that significant differences within cultures have been found, yet still are overlooked on aggregated levels.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information