Table of Contents

Governing Disasters

Governing Disasters

The Challenges of Emergency Risk Regulation

Edited by Alberto Alemanno

This is the first volume that addresses the complexities of the volcanic ash cloud that overshadowed Europe in April 2011, but has subsequently struck again in Australia, Chile and Europe. It does so from a multidisciplinary perspective, drawing upon research from economics, law, sociology and other fields, as well as volcanology and leading expertise in jet engineering. Whilst our knowledge base is wide-ranging, there is a common focus on the practical lessons of the ash cloud crisis both for subsequent eruptions and for emergency risk regulation more generally.

Chapter 14: The Volcanic Ash Crisis and EU Air Passenger Rights

Nick Bernard

Subjects: economics and finance, transport, environment, disasters, transport, law - academic, european law, regulation and governance, politics and public policy, public policy, urban and regional studies, transport


Nick Bernard 14.1 INTRODUCTION The volcanic ash crisis gave Regulation 261/20041 on air passenger rights in case of denied boarding, long delays or cancellation of flights, if not its baptism of fire – the Regulation has had a good five years to bed down since it came into force – nonetheless a serious challenge to its ability to cope with unusual events giving rise to prolonged air travel disruptions. Indeed, some voices in the industry have questioned, sometimes in strong or colourful language, whether the Regulation was meant to apply to such situations as the volcanic ash crisis at all.2 While most airlines have accepted, under the pressure from the EU Commission and national regulators, that passengers may be entitled to the ‘right to care’ under article 9 of the Regulation, it is clear that some have done so under protest and remain unconvinced that the Regulation should apply to events of similar magnitude.3 While, as will be discussed below, the case for the non-applicability of the Regulation to the ash crisis situation is unconvincing, it remains true that the mechanisms established by the Regulation do give rise to difficulties in such a situation, not just from the airlines’ perspective but also from that of passengers. Whether or not the Regulation was meant to apply to the situation, it still does not entirely solve the question of who should eventually bear the cost of caring for passengers. At best, determining whether the Regulation applies enables us to decide whether passengers or...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information