Table of Contents

Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience

Innovation, Global Change and Territorial Resilience

New Horizons in Regional Science series

Edited by Philip Cooke, Mario Davide Parrilli and José Luis Curbelo

Localized creativity, small high-tech entrepreneurship, related innovation platforms, social capital embedded in dynamically open territorial communities and context-specific though continuously upgrading policy platforms are all means to face new challenges and to promote increased absorptive capacity within local and national territories. The contributors illustrate that these capabilities are much needed in the current globalized economy as a path towards sustainability and for creating new opportunities for their inhabitants. They analyse the challenges and development prospects of local/regional production systems internally, across territories, and in terms of their potential and territorial connectivity which can help exploit opportunities for proactive policy actions. This is increasingly relevant in the current climate, in which the balanced allocation of resources and opportunities, particularly for SMEs, cannot be expected to be the automatic result of the working of the market.

Chapter 17: A Participatory Methodology for Evaluating the Cluster Policy of the Basque Country

Cristina Aragón, Maria José Aranguren, Cristina Iturrioz and James R. Wilson

Subjects: economics and finance, economics of innovation, industrial economics, regional economics, innovation and technology, economics of innovation, urban and regional studies, regional economics


Cristina Aragón, Maria José Aranguren, Cristina Iturrioz and James R. Wilson I. INTRODUCTION Policies that aim to support clusters of firms are now well-established tools of regional policy agencies. Since the 1980s, and rooted in research with a much longer pedigree, a large literature has emerged around clusters, motivated by the apparent success of Marshallian-type industrial districts in Italy (Becattini, 1978; 1991; Becattini et al., 2003; Piore and Sabel, 1984; Pyke et al., 1990) alongside a range of other experiences (Christerson and Lever-Tracy, 1997; Saxenian, 1994; Schmitz and Musyck, 1994). Porter’s (1990; 1998a; 2004) promotion of industrial clusters in the context of the competitiveness of particular locations has been especially influential among regional policy-makers, establishing clusters as a key focus for regional economic development. Among the growing obsession with clusters, however, there has been some scepticism (Martin and Sunley, 2003; Sugden et al., 2006) around the way in which the concept has frequently been seen as a policy panacea. Indeed, given their prominent and widespread position on regional policy agendas, the evaluation of cluster policies is a critical yet under-examined issue. The Basque Country Autonomous Community (CAPV) in Spain was one of the pioneers of regional cluster policy, applying Porter’s framework from the early 1990s (Aranguren et al., 2006). The cluster policy today supports 11 priority clusters, nine of which have been supported since the 1990s, and five emerging ‘pre-clusters’. In recent years various evaluations have been made of different aspects of the policy, but it has proved challenging...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information