Table of Contents

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Social Capital

Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Social Capital

Handbooks of Research Methods and Applications series

Edited by Yaojun Li

Social capital is fundamentally concerned with resources in social relations. This Handbook brings together leading scholars from around the world to address important questions on the determinants, manifestations and consequences of social capital. Combining cutting-edge theory and appropriate data and methods, it presents a challenge to both social capital researchers interested in explaining social inequality and to policy-makers with responsibility for designing effective measures for enhancing social cohesion.

Chapter 9: The efficacy of neighbourhood attitudes as measures of social capital: returning to norms and values and the centrality of networks

James Laurence

Subjects: business and management, research methods in business and management, development studies, development studies, research methods in development, politics and public policy, research methods in politics and public policy, research methods, research methods in business and management, research methods in development, research methods in economics, research methods in politics and public policy, research methods in social policy, social policy and sociology, research methods in social policy, sociology and sociological theory

Extract

A growing number of studies demonstrate how the characteristics of communities (for example, how ethnically heterogeneous or socioeconomically disadvantaged they are) can affect an individual’s attitudes towards their neighbours and neighbourhoods; in particular, their trust in neighbours (henceforth TiN) (Putnam, 2007; Laurence, 2011). Applying these attitudinal measures as indicators of social capital, these studies have concluded that such characteristics of a community therefore undermine social capital. Given the rising importance attributed to social capital as a possible explanation for differences in life outcomes between communities, such as their levels of violent crime (Sampson et al., 1997) or health outcomes (Kawachi et al., 1999), it is important to understand what factors cultivate or erode social capital. However, a significant criticism levelled at such research is how far the variables frequently applied to measure social capital actually capture its presence due to a distinct ‘lack of knowledge of the validity of current [social capital] measures’ (Moore et al., 2009: 536; Haynes, 2009; Fine, 2010). Considering the purported benefits of social capital, we believe it is crucial to try and understand the efficacy of attitudes such as TiN for measuring social capital in a community. Exploring the validity of these attitudes as measures of social capital, however, is a difficult task.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information