The New Limits of Education Policy

The New Limits of Education Policy

Avoiding a Tragedy of the Commons

Roger Benjamin

Using a political economy framework to analyze the current problems facing US postsecondary education, The New Limits of Education Policy tackles the questions surrounding the future of higher education. The study provides an explanation of why improvement of teaching and learning is not a high priority for the stakeholders involved. Roger Benjamin explains why heightened recognition by the State of the importance of human capital in the knowledge economy will create the external conditions that will, in turn, create the need for an altered incentive system for these stakeholders. He goes on to make a case for additional positive incentives that would reward behavior that improves teaching and learning.

Chapter 6: The Place of Assessment in the Redesign of the Nevada Post-secondary Education System

Roger Benjamin

Subjects: economics and finance, public sector economics, education, education policy, politics and public policy, education policy, social policy and sociology, education policy


6. The place of assessment in the redesign of the Nevada postsecondary education system INTRODUCTION If a detailed analysis of CUNY revealed a hollowing out of the capacity to deliver undergraduate education, its negative consequences for quality of student learning presumably would have surfaced naturally if faculty and administrators had had the results of student learning benchmarks available to them. The case of CUNY involved declining enrollments and declining budgets. What can we learn about the possible role of assessment from a situation that presents the need for a post-secondary education system to respond to the demands placed upon it by economic growth and problems of access to post-secondary education created by growth in population? Nevada offered such a case for my colleagues and I to examine in 2002.63 A strategic plan requires: (a) an accurate assessment of the current system (Ewell, 1999); (b) the construction of a vision shared by the Regents, chancellor, presidents of institutions, state leaders (see Builder and Dewar, 1994); (c) the mission differentiation and governance system authorized to achieve the vision; and (d) the strategies agreed upon to achieve the specific goals in the plan (Heracleous, 1998). Such a plan is meant to serve as the blueprint guiding future policy making and specific decisions at all levels regarding, for example, where and when to establish new post-secondary institutions, where and when to establish new academic programs, and how best to assess quality. While the monograph, The Road Less Traveled (Benjamin et al., 2002), uses innovative...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information