Table of Contents

International Handbook on Social Policy and the Environment

International Handbook on Social Policy and the Environment

Elgar original reference

Edited by Tony Fitzpatrick

Environmental change is central to the global social policy challenges of the twenty-first century. This comprehensive Handbook brings together leading experts from around the world to address the most important questions and issues we face. How should welfare states adapt to environmental change? To what extent are the ecological and social policy agendas compatible? Must we contemplate radical reforms to the principles and organisation of welfare services? Combining cutting-edge theory and data in an interdisciplinary approach, this Handbook both summarises existing developments and suggests how debates and research must develop in the future.

Chapter 2: Unequal emissions - unequal policy impacts: how do different areas of CO2 emissions compare?

Milena Büchs, Nicholas Bardsley and Sylke V. Schnepf

Subjects: environment, environmental sociology, social policy and sociology, comparative social policy


It is increasingly clear that radical policies to mitigate anthropogenic climate change (hereafter 'mitigation policies') are urgently required as its impacts are already threatening food security, damaging ecological systems and creating new social inequalities, for example related to severe weather events. Such impacts are set to worsen and contribute to mass migration, resource conflicts and other catastrophic outcomes if greenhouse gas emissions from human activities continue to accelerate. An important element of mitigation policies will be to reduce the combustion of fossil fuels, and thus the release of carbon dioxide (CO2), the greenhouse gas which contributes the most to current warming. From a social policy perspective, an important question is how mitigation policies can be designed such that unjust distributional effects are, so far as possible, avoided. This requires proportionality in terms of people's financial capacities as well as in terms of their relative contribution to emissions. This is important both from a fairness perspective and for the public acceptability of such policies. Acceptability is likely to influence the likelihood that governments adopt them, as is borne out by the available policy research (Bristow et al. 2010). Such policies are unlikely to be implemented without a new global agreement on climate change mitigation. The current United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) process would only implement such an agreement by 2020 at the earliest under the 'Doha Gateway' set up at the latest Conference of the Parties (COP) meeting (Ritter and Casey 2012).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information