Table of Contents

The International Handbook of Political Ecology

The International Handbook of Political Ecology

Edited by Raymond L. Bryant

The International Handbook features chapters by leading scholars from around the world in a unique collection exploring the multi-disciplinary field of political ecology. This landmark volume canvasses key developments, topics, issues, debates and concepts showcasing how political ecologists today address pressing social and environmental concerns. Introductory chapters provide an overview of political ecology and the Handbook. Remaining chapters examine five broad themes: issues and approaches; governance and power; knowledge and discourse; method and scale; connections and transformations. Across diverse topics and perspectives, these chapters amount to a wide-ranging survey of current research, making the International Handbook an indispensable reference for scholars and students in political ecology.

Chapter 9: Postcoloniality and the North–South binary revisited: the case of India’s climate politics

Shangrila Joshi

Subjects: environment, environmental politics and policy, environmental sociology, geography, human geography, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy


This chapter uses the case study of India’s participation in global climate negotiations to shed light on the dynamics of contemporary North–South climate politics. India’s negotiating position seizes the strategic essentialism of the imaginary of the South for the purposes of distinguishing its position in climate politics from that of the North, and making a claim to its right to development and ecological space in the context of a shrinking atmospheric commons. It also engages in a politics of scale whereby the argument that the Indian state should not be asked to accept a binding cap on its greenhouse gas emissions is based on low per capita emissions of its citizens and on the assertion that India is a developing country. This chapter argues that India’s climate politics constitutes a postcolonial politics, and that we need to rethink some core approaches in postcolonialism––particularly related to the rejection of colonial binaries––in order to see it in this light. Significantly, this chapter makes a case for why political ecologists ought to examine ongoing international climate negotiations and why the scope of political ecology needs to be broadened in order to do this. Specifically, I argue that political ecology needs to engage more seriously with North–South differences that are central to contemporary climate politics. Furthermore, scholars undertaking such analyses are invited to practice greater introspection towards India’s positionality in terms of contributing to the problem of climate change as well as potential complicity in perpetuating unequal structures of power and knowledge construction in this context.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information