Table of Contents

The Goals of Competition Law

The Goals of Competition Law

ASCOLA Competition Law series

Edited by Daniel Zimmer

What are the normative foundations of competition law? That is the question at the heart of this book. Leading scholars consider whether this branch of law serves just one or more than one goal, and, if it serves to protect unfettered competition as such, how this goal relates to other objectives such as the promotion of economic welfare.

Chapter 10: Economic Content of Competition Law: The Point of Regulating Preferences

Adrian Künzler

Subjects: economics and finance, law and economics, law - academic, competition and antitrust law, law and economics

Extract

Adrian Künzler* 41 1 INTRODUCTION Over the last few decades the criteria governing the application of EC Competition Law have been subjected to substantial changes. Apart from procedure, through the enactment of Regulation 1/2003, they have predominantly concerned substance through a wider recourse to economic analysis. As a result of this process, the same basic aims of competition law have been questioned: while in the past EC competition law was seen as squarely directed at the protection of the competitive process – or the protection of the freedom to compete – there is now a tendency for restrictions of competition to be appraised more and more by efficiency criteria such as social or consumer welfare, efficient allocation of production factors or, in short, their economic outcomes. Under this approach, the purpose of rules against private restraints on competition would consist solely of maximizing economic welfare. Therefore competition restraints would be assessed with reference to their impacts on economic welfare. If welfare is diminished then the practice under assessment should be prohibited; otherwise, i.e., if welfare is increased or in cases of welfare-economic neutrality – or indeed uncertainty – the practice must be declared permissible. Hence the striving for a ‘more economic approach’ embodies the quest for an ‘economically correct competition policy’, or a ‘more objective approach’. The maximization of economic welfare is deemed to be the supreme objective of the law against private restraints on * Branco Weiss Fellow of Society in Science (ETH Zurich) at Yale Law  School;  LL.M., Yale Law School (2011)...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information