International Investment Law and the Environment

International Investment Law and the Environment

Elgar International Investment Law series

Saverio Di Benedetto

This book expands upon research into the protection of foreign investments, which is currently an intensively studied area of international law. At the same time, it also examines environmental protection, as well as general areas of debate in international law, including fragmentation, self-contained regimes, the role of interpretation and of principles, and theories of indeterminacy.

Chapter 5: Internal arguments: from ordinary meanings to derogatory logic

Saverio Di Benedetto

Subjects: law - academic, environmental law, international investment law


Chapter 5 considers the internal arguments by which tribunals have dealt with potential conflicts between foreign investor rights and environmental protection. These internal arguments are simply those which tribunals have developed by following the internal interpretative canons of IIL, that is, the canons which look at the ordinary meaning of applicable rules and in the context of IIL – do not in themselves involve taking into account values and interests other than property-related and commercial ones. As explained in Chapter 4, there is a wide range of internal hermeneutical canons in international investment law, and these usually encompass not only literal, but also contextual and teleological forms of interpretation. In other legal frameworks, contextual and, most of all, teleological canons of interpretation may favour the integration of values and principles which are different from those embedded in the rules that are applicable to a given case. However, when these canons apply to the concepts and rules of IIL, they commonly orient the interpreter towards a unitary axiological perspective. The one-dimensional character of IIL not only explains why these interpretative canons lead to internal arguments, it is also an important factor in the question of integration. Indeed, since the context and purposes of investment treaties do not usually recognize values and interests other than the property and commercial rights of foreign investors, taking due account of fundamental social and human values in an investment dispute is problematic.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information