Table of Contents

Handbook on Transport and Development

Handbook on Transport and Development

Edited by Robin Hickman, Moshe Givoni, David Bonilla and David Banister

This Handbook provides an extensive overview of the relationships between transport and development. With 45 chapters from leading international authors, the book is organised in three main parts: urban structure and travel; transport and spatial impacts; and wider dimensions in transport and development. The chapters each present commentary on key issues within these themes, presenting the debate on the impacts of urban structure on travel, the impacts of transport investment on development, and social and cultural change on travel. A multitude of angles are considered – leaving the reader with a comprehensive and critical understanding of the field.

Chapter 12: How stable are preferences for neighbourhood type and design in residential moves?

Kevin J. Krizek, Ahmed El-Geneidy and Ryan Wilson

Subjects: development studies, development studies, economics and finance, environmental economics, transport, environment, environmental economics, transport, urban and regional studies, transport


Active discussions in land-use and transportation planning circles continue to revolve around three related dimensions of travel behavior, neighborhood design and preferences. The bulk of this literature clearly focuses on the strength and magnitude of correlations between neighborhood design and travel behavior; many literature reviews have been published (Badoe and Miller, 2000; Crane, 2000; Ewing and Cervero, 2010) and more appear each year focusing on different dimensions or contexts such as walkable environments or different measures of accessibility (van Wee, 2002; Saelens et al., 2003; Geurs and van Wee, 2004; Saelens and Handy, 2008; Transportation Research Board, 2009). An outstanding question arising from this research relates to the issue commonly referred to as “self-selection”. Attitudes and preferences for neighborhood design may influence travel more than the neighborhood design itself. In other words, showing correlations that people living in higher density/mixed-use developments walk more tells an incomplete story; it does not necessarily mean developing additional communities of this type will lead to more walking. Subsequently, an active body of literature aims to better understand the role of preferences. For almost a dozen years now, research has aimed to differentiate between the factors influencing one’s inclination to walk from their residential choice to live in neighborhoods that support walking.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information