Work Inequalities in the Crisis

Work Inequalities in the Crisis

Evidence from Europe

Edited by Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead

This book offers a unique combination of research, case studies and policy discussions. An assessment of national trends in 30 European countries precedes case studies of 14 of them, in which noted European specialists report on individual enterprises or sectors. The volume’s survey of national- and local-level policy solutions contributes to identifying those responses that strengthen economic competitiveness, preserve social cohesion and do not deepen inequalities.

Chapter 11: Negotiated Flexibility in Sweden: A More Egalitarian Response to the Crisis?

Dominique Anxo

Subjects: economics and finance, labour economics, social policy and sociology, economics of social policy


Dominique Anxo 1. INTRODUCTION The Swedish model is based on a strong political commitment to the goal of full employment (see Anxo and Niklasson 2006). In contrast to other EU Member States such as France and Germany, economic downturns and structural changes have seldom been accommodated by public measures aimed at maintaining employment and favouring labour hoarding, for example by reducing working time, short-time working or work sharing. Traditionally, employment adjustments in Sweden have taken the form of external numerical flexibility, combined with active labour market policy and relatively generous income support. In line with this tradition, when confronted by the severe deterioration of the situation in the labour market, and in order to mitigate the impact of the crisis on income development and employment, the Swedish Government in 2008–2009 implemented a package of recovery and countercyclical measures, ranging from expansive fiscal and monetary policy to active labour market and educational policy. The main objective of this chapter is to describe the patterns of employment adjustment during the current economic downturns and the role played by the Government and the two sides of industry in this adjustment process. The distinct feature of the Swedish industrial relations system and the contractual nature of labour market regulation create a favourable institutional environment for the emergence of negotiated compromises aimed at balancing flexibility and security. Sweden therefore represents a good illustration of a regime of flexicurity and negotiated flexibility, where the social partners are heavily involved not only in the shaping of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information