Table of Contents

Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism

Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism

Research Handbooks in International Law series

Edited by Ben Saul

This Handbook brings together leading scholars and practitioners to examine the prolific body of international laws governing terrorism. It exhaustively covers the global response to terrorism in transnational criminal law, the international law on the use of force, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, the law of State responsibility, the United Nations Security Council, General Assembly, UN specialised bodies, and regional organisations. It also addresses special legal issues in dealing with terrorism such as gender, religion, victims of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, and customary law.

Chapter 35: The United Nations Security Council’s counter-terrorism Al-Qaida sanctions regime: Resolution 1267 and the 1267 Committee

Lisa Ginsborg

Subjects: law - academic, human rights, public international law, terrorism and security law, politics and public policy, human rights, terrorism and security


What started as just one of many sanctions regimes in the history of the United Nations Security Council rapidly became, after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2011 (9/11), one of the most controversial and widely criticized. Since its creation in 1999, the Resolution 1267 sanctions regime, known today as the ‘Al-Qaida sanctions regime’, has been subject to numerous and radical transformations in response both to wider historical and political events and growing criticism of the regime itself, in particular its human rights implications. This chapter gives an overview of the evolution of the 1267 sanctions regime and the controversies surrounding the practice of ‘blacklisting’ individuals and entities suspected of association with Al-Qaida. The chapter concludes that despite the significant improvements brought about by the establishment of Office of the Ombudsperson in 2009 to review delisting requests, the 1267 regime still presents a number of problems for the rights of individuals targeted by the sanctions. In particular, while in practice the Ombudsperson delisting system has been providing an effective remedy to listed individuals and entities to date, on paper it still lacks procedural fairness in a number of areas. Finally, the lack of an effective periodic review of listings by the Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee (also known as the 1267 Committee) itself may call for still stronger procedural guarantees.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information