Table of Contents

Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law

Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law

ATRIP Intellectual Property series

Edited by Jan Rosén

Individualism and Collectiveness in Intellectual Property Law embraces fundamental, eternal and yet very contemporary elements in IP law dealt with in all parts of the world. There are certain classic values embedded in the protection of human effort and the creativeness of individuals. This book examines the relationship of those values to the questions inherent both in individual creativeness in a collective setting, and in the tendency to build national, regional or global monopolies based on IP rights. The respect for original ownership, the occasional need for collective management of IP rights, the idiosyncrasies of co-ownership of rights and the ever present tension to be found in encounters between exploitation of IP rights and competition law are extensively exposed in this book.

Chapter 13: Trademark Take-over or Sui Generis Regimes: Absolute Merchandising Rights in Sports

Katja Weckström

Subjects: law - academic, intellectual property law


Katja Weckström* 1. INTRODUCTION In a constitutional state, committed to liberal values, the intervention of the legislator in the market forces of free competition requires a specific justification. Economically speaking, this justification rests on the consideration that, without any such intervention, a market failure would ensue after a certain period of time.1 When considering justifications, there are two possibilities. We can consider the justification for each individual right in intellectual property, i.e., copyright, design, geographical indication or trademark, separately. Legislatures tend to do so when balancing incentives for intervention against those for non-intervention.2 Alternatively, we could consider the market position conferred by IP rights in general in a particular field, before considering whether market intervention is justified via a particular form of IP protection. The latter, i.e., horizontal intellectual property law issues are seldom considered.3 A natural consequence of this is that horizontal issues related to the rest of the legal system are also ignored, or considered from only one perspective; e.g. trademarks are balanced against freedom of expression concerns. I argue that it is here, when protection crosses over the interface * Lecturer, LL.D. Candidate University of Turku Faculty of Law. The author would like to thank John Cross, Graeme Dinwoodie, Shuba Gosh, Annette Kur for comments on previous drafts of this article. 1 Hilty, Reto M., ‘The Law Against Unfair Competition and Its Interfaces’, pp. 1–2 in Hilty, Reto M. & Henning-Bodewig, Frauke, Law Against Unfair Competition – Towards a New Paradigm in Europe?, Springer-Verlag Berlin (2007) pp. 1...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information