Multilevel Environmental Governance

Multilevel Environmental Governance

Managing Water and Climate Change in Europe and North America

Edited by Inger Weibust and James Meadowcroft

The literature on Multi-level governance (MLG), an approach that explicitly looks at the system of the many interacting authority structures at work in the global political economy, has grown significantly over the last decade. The authors in this volume examine how multilevel governance (MLG) systems address climate change and water policy.

Chapter 5: Playing a zero sum game: sharing water between jurisdictions in federations

Inger Weibust

Subjects: environment, climate change, environmental politics and policy, water, politics and public policy, environmental politics and policy, regulation and governance


Climate change has been raising concerns about water shortages and interstate water wars, even though the most recent case of armed conflict over water occurred 4500 years ago. More recently, in 1934, armed troops massed along a border in a water supply conflict. The border in question was not an international boundary but the one between Arizona and California. Arizona's governor called out the National Guard to prevent California's construction of the Parker dam, which was expected to reduce Arizona's share of the Colorado River (Gleick 2000). The United States (US) Supreme Court eventually settled the dispute (Gleick 2009a). Although armed conflict over water is very rare, other forms of conflict are commonplace when river waters are allocated between jurisdictions directly upstream/ downstream of one another. The game theory term for this zero sum situation is 'pure conflict,' because there is no win/win solution. A unit of water consumed by one jurisdiction cannot also be consumed by another. Furthermore, river flow allocation can illustrate additional meanings of 'conflict': contention and rivalry. A legal scholar of US interstate water disputes compares these to kickboxing: not lethal but fairly vicious nonetheless (Ruhl 2003, 57). Another legal scholar contends that interstate water conflicts are never 'resolved with finality. Such conflicts have a great deal in common with volcanoes: sometimes they are active, sometimes they are dormant but they are always volcanoes.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information