Table of Contents

Handbook of Research on Employee Voice

Handbook of Research on Employee Voice

Elgar original reference

Edited by Adrian Wilkinson, Jimmy Donaghey, Tony Dundon and Richard B. Freeman

The term ‘employee voice’ refers to the ways and means through which employees can attempt to have a say and influence organizational issues that affect their work and the interests of managers and owners. The concept is distinct, but related to and often overlapping with issues such as participation, involvement and, more recently, engagement. This Handbook provides an up-to-date survey of the current research into employee voice, sets this research into context and sets a marker for future research in the area.

Chapter 22: Regulation of employee voice

Paul J. Gollan, Glenn Patmore and Ying Xu

Subjects: business and management, human resource management, organisational behaviour


Employee voice is profoundly influenced by the law. The law determines the forms of voice that are permitted or encouraged, the structure of workplace institutions, and the relationship between management and employees. Yet there is a 'relative absence' of legal perspectives in the industrial relations (IR) literature on employee voice (Novitz and Bogg 2011: 3). The lack of research linking legal provisions to workplace practices and outcomes (see also Bogg and Novitz 2012) is an important oversight in the existing scholarship. This is especially so since legal regulation is a key determinant of workplace democracy, organizational efficiency and employee well-being (see, for example, Bogg and Novitz 2012; Gollan and Patmore 2006; Kaine 2012; Perrett 2007). This chapter addresses the lacuna in the literature by providing an overview of the existing and emerging research regarding legal regulation of employee voice in the USA and Australia, with a particular focus on the regulation of collective bargaining. We compare the progenitor of labour law reform in Anglo countries, the National Labor Relations Act 29 USC ßß 151-69 (hereafter NLRA, also known as the Wagner Act (1935)), with the most recent form of such regulation, the Australian Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (herein FWA). There has been relatively little recent research comparing these two countries since the enactment of the FWA in 2009 (Forsyth 2012). Our comparison highlights the fact that there are varieties of national legislation regulating employee voice.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information