Chapter 19: Ecotourism and conservation
The editorial invitation to contribute this chapter also suggested a subtitle: ‘The good, the bad and the ugly’. Although I have not adopted this phrase in the title, it does potentially provide a useful conceptual framework, because it throws into stark relief the different perspectives of commercial tourism operators, and landowners and wildlife managers. At a global scale, most tourism does not involve conservation, and most conservation does not involve tourism. Where they do overlap, there are commonly costs and controversies as well as potential gains (Buckley, 2008). Generally, tour operators want access to land and wildlife that are attractors for their clients, in order to make money for themselves and their shareholders. If they can get such access cheaply, free or subsidized, they can make larger profits, especially if they can gain exclusive or preferential rights that their immediate competitors do not have. Owners and managers of lands and wildlife, in contrast, need funds and other resources for conservation management. They see tourists, either as individuals or as clients of commercial operators, as one potential source of income. Other income sources include government budget appropriations, donor funding, and payments for ecosystem services such as water supply or carbon sequestration. In contrast to these sources, tourism also brings substantial costs.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.