International Merger Policy

International Merger Policy

Applying Domestic Law to International Markets

Julie Clarke

International Merger Policy offers a compelling comparative assessment of domestic and regional merger laws and procedures. Identifying important areas of convergence and emerging best practice, it considers existing levels of international cooperation and identifies the key costs associated with transnational merger review before evaluating possible mechanisms by which they might be reduced.

Chapter 4: Merger review procedure

Julie Clarke

Subjects: economics and finance, money and banking, law - academic, competition and antitrust law


Merger law will be most effective at deterring and preventing anti-competitive mergers where appropriate procedural mechanisms are in place to detect, prevent or unravel mergers which contravene the substantive laws. Procedural regulation of mergers should therefore aim to facilitate the identification and prevention of mergers which might contravene substantive law while keeping to a minimum the cost to parties and regulators. The public nature of mergers facilitates the use of pre-merger notification (PMN) processes and these have been adopted in most jurisdictions which have enacted substantive merger laws. In addition, the extraterritorial reach of merger laws in most jurisdictions means that regardless of where the merger takes place, the location of the merging parties, or likely competitive impact, the procedural requirements of all jurisdictions potentially affected by the transaction need to be considered by firms proposing to merge. As a result, the divergence in administrative structures and procedures surrounding PMN obligations is more acute than the variations in substantive legal obligations. This divergence has been magnified by the introduction of several relatively new but strategically important merger regimes, particularly in the BRIC countries, which all now adopt mandatory and suspensory PMN regimes. The increasing size, complexity and geographic reach of mergers in the last decade, combined with the expense and complexity of procedural obligations, have generated persistent calls for the reform of merger notification procedures.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information