Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China

Neighbourhood Governance in Urban China

Edited by Ngai-Ming Yip

As the economy and society of China has become more diversified, so have its urban neighbourhoods. The last decade has witnessed a surge in collective action by homeowners in China against the infringement of their rights. Research on neighbourhood governance is sparse and limited so this book fills a vital gap in the literature and understanding.

Chapter 4: The institutionalization of neighbourhood governance: dilemma and political hurdles

Yong Gui and Weihong Ma

Subjects: asian studies, asian geography, asian politics and policy, asian urban and regional studies, politics and public policy, asian politics, regulation and governance, urban and regional studies, urban studies


As is well known, the danwei (work unit) used to be the basic and significant unit of social management in urban China. Not only was it the main channel for distributing resources; it was also the tool for state control over society (Walder, 1986; Whyte and Parish, 1984). Cities at that time resembled collections of independent workplace-based neighbourhoods, rather than integrated urban entities (Bray, 2005, pp. 4-5). However, market reform and increasing competition since the 1980s have forced the closure of inefficient danweis and weakened their capacity as comprehensive welfare providers. The housing reform in 1998, which required danweis to sell off their housing stock to employees at discount prices and greatly advanced the 'socialization and marketization' of welfare provision, has put an end to danweis as resource provision units. This made a fundamental change to the urban social structure (Zhao and Bourassa, 2003; Wang and Murie, 1999). Housing privatization created new residential neighbourhoods in urban China and, along with such developments, new neighbourhood organizations, such as homeowners' associations (yezhu weiyuanhui) and property management companies, have been created. These new organizations are basically economic institutions set up, respectively, for the protection of homeowners' property interests and for business organizations that serve to maintain these interests.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information